Epstein Client List

[Dukasaur]

https://globalnews.ca/news/11586484/at- ... y-epstein/

At least 16 files disappeared from the Justice Department’s public webpage for documents related to Jeffrey Epstein — including a photograph showing President Donald Trump — less than a day after they were posted, with no explanation from the government and no notice to the public.


The missing files, which were available Friday and no longer accessible by Saturday, included images of paintings depicting nude women, and one showing a series of photographs along a credenza and in drawers. In that image, inside a drawer among other photos, was a photograph of Trump, alongside Epstein, Melania Trump and Epstein’s longtime associate Ghislaine Maxwell.

The Justice Department did not say why the files were removed or whether their disappearance was intentional. A spokesperson for the department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

[jusplay4fun]

Here is why, Duk:

The Department of Justice restored online a photo from the Jeffrey Epstein files that contained images showing President Donald Trump after backlash over its removal.

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche earlier said the DOJ removed several Epstein file documents from its website to comply with part of a federal court order aimed at protecting victims.

Blanche denied the removal of a specific photo had anything to do with it showing images of Trump.

The Department of Justice on Sunday restored online a photo from the Jeffrey Epstein files that contained images showing President Donald Trump after backlash over its removal.

The image, which contained two separate photos showing Trump, had been removed by the DOJ from public view after being published on the department’s website on Friday. The image showed an array of items on and in Epstein’s desk or credenza.

One of the photos showed Trump with a group of women, while the other was a well-known image showing him with his wife, Melania, Epstein, and Epstein’s now-convicted accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell.

“The Southern District of New York flagged an image of President Trump for potential further action to protect victims,” the DOJ said in a post on the social media site X.

“Out of an abundance of caution, the Department of Justice temporarily removed the image for further review. After the review, it was determined there is no evidence that any Epstein victims are depicted in the photograph, and it has been reposted without any alteration or redaction.”

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/12/21/epstein ... o-doj.html

and, I said in August 22, 2025 in this same thread, about the LEGAL requirement and need to protect victims:

there is no there there.

I would think that the Grand Jury heard from victims and thus that is what is being protected, the identity and testimony of some who gave testimony under the condition of anonymity. So it is NOT

just an FBI officer's summary of the evidence up to that point.

And Yes, I know that there is LOTS more that the FBI has. I predicted to a few that the Grand Jury testimony would LIKELY NOT be released.

As required by LONG-STANDING Laws and Legal Precedent, we must MUST and DO PROTECT victims of sexual assault and that is why many photos and documents have been redacted (blacked out) in this matter. btw: I am sorry pack rat cannot see prurient photos that he continues to salivate about in his dreams.

Those suffering from TDS keep looking for SOMETHING, some iota, to try to embarass Trump. Remember this when pack rat tries to insult me with his impotent, ridiculous, and inaccurate vituperations. Also remember that pack rat = LOSER

All that Duk and pack rat have are allegations, rumors, and innuendos. There are NO charges, no crimes (by Trump), no proof, and NO one left on base. They refuse to let this issue DIE when there is NO there there.

[Pack Rat]

Cool story bro...

[Pack Rat]

[jusplay4fun]

Cool story bro...

Do you understand Opinion vs. Fact, pack rat? You REALLY are BAD at this, you know.

It's called The LAW, it is NOT a story. So you KNOW:

1. What is the “VAWA Confidentiality Provision”?
The VAWA Confidentiality Provision refers to 34 U.S.C. 12291(b)(2), a provision of the
Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) that requires all grantees and subgrantees
receiving VAWA funding from the Department of Justice, Office on Violence Against
Women, to protect the confidentiality and privacy of persons to whom those grantees
and subgrantees are providing services. The VAWA Confidentiality Provision is
designed to ensure the safety of adult, youth, and child victims of domestic violence,
dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking.

(...)
3. What does it mean to be “covered” by the VAWA Confidentiality Provision?
Grantees and subgrantees “covered” by the VAWA Confidentiality Provision must
adhere to the requirements of that Provision; that is, they may not disclose, reveal, or
release personally identifying information or individual information collected in
connection with services requested, utilized, or denied through grantees’ and subgrantees’
programs, regardless of whether the information has been encoded, encrypted, hashed, or
otherwise protected.
4. What is “personally identifying information”?
“Personally identifying information” means information about an individual that may
directly or indirectly identify that individual. In the case of a victim of domestic violence,
dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking, it also means information that would disclose
the location of that individual.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
on the VAWA Confidentiality Provision
(34 U.S.C. § 12291(b)(2))

https://www.justice.gov/ovw/page/file/1006896/dl

So tell all your liberal friends, especially in Congress, pee pack rat, to learn the BASICS of the Law.

And almost NO ONE watches your silly videos. I think you got ONE response in 6 months on one video, but I ignore most of your posts, so I do not track that sort of thing.

[Pack Rat]

One thing I know as fact. Your fear of the Epstein Files being released is obvious.

Trump is yelling squirrel and throwing shiny objects and blowing up unarmed speed boats to distract his cover up and ignoring Congress demands to the release of the Epstein Files.

You are a protector of the rich and powerful pedophiles and sex traffickers. Sick!

[jusplay4fun]

You are not very good at this, are you pack rat? You're a Loser.

As usual, pack rat does not know what he is talking about, especially when it regards me.

pee rat does not understand fact vs. opinion, reality vs. fiction. pee rat = pee rat = LOSER. It's Transitive, and the Truth.

And pee rat does not understand The Law. Loser.

[mookiemcgee]

there is no there there.

Click image to enlarge.

Epstein's (pedophile) letter to Larry Nassar (pedophile) right before his suicide

"Our President also shares our love of young, nubile girls"

Click image to enlarge.

[jusplay4fun]

That "letter" or note was identified as likely a FAKE, by the FBI. THERE is still NO THERE there, Mookie.

Today 29,000 documents released AND this is your best SHOT? Give up it, Mookie. How many websites did you check before posting that BOGUS claim, Mookie. Talk about

a thoughtful and detailed posts [sic]

well, this is NOT.

FBI calls alleged letter to Larry Nassar from 'J. Epstein' a fake
Mark Giannotto
Bart Jansen
USA TODAY
Updated Dec. 23, 2025, 5:06 p.m. ET

The FBI is calling a letter alleged to be from Jeffrey Epstein to disgraced former USA Gymnastics team doctor Larry Nassar a fake.

The letter was among the more than 29,000 documents released by the Justice Department on Tuesday, Dec. 23.

The writing does not appear to match Jeffrey Epstein’s.

The letter was postmarked three days after Epstein's death out of Northern Virginia, when he was jailed in New York.

The return address did not list the jail where Epstein was held and did not include his inmate number, which is required for outgoing mail.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/2 ... 894400007/

FBI says Epstein letter to Larry Nassar was a fake
by Rebecca Beitsch - 12/23/25 4:14 PM ET

https://thehill.com/homenews/5661621-fa ... rd-nassar/

and MORE:

The Justice Department said the latest records contain “untrue and sensationalist” accusations against Trump from before the 2020 election. "To be clear: the claims are unfounded and false, and if they had a shred of credibility, they certainly would have been weaponized against President Trump already," the department said.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/liv ... p_catchall

[mookiemcgee]

That "letter" or note was identified as likely a FAKE, by the FBI. THERE is still NO THERE there, Mookie.

Today 29,000 documents released AND this is your best SHOT? Give up it, Mookie. How many websites did you check before posting that BOGUS claim, Mookie. Talk about

a thoughtful and detailed posts [sic]

well, this is NOT.

FBI calls alleged letter to Larry Nassar from 'J. Epstein' a fake
Mark Giannotto
Bart Jansen
USA TODAY
Updated Dec. 23, 2025, 5:06 p.m. ET

The FBI is calling a letter alleged to be from Jeffrey Epstein to disgraced former USA Gymnastics team doctor Larry Nassar a fake.

The letter was among the more than 29,000 documents released by the Justice Department on Tuesday, Dec. 23.

The writing does not appear to match Jeffrey Epstein’s.

The letter was postmarked three days after Epstein's death out of Northern Virginia, when he was jailed in New York.

The return address did not list the jail where Epstein was held and did not include his inmate number, which is required for outgoing mail.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/2 ... 894400007/

FBI says Epstein letter to Larry Nassar was a fake
by Rebecca Beitsch - 12/23/25 4:14 PM ET

https://thehill.com/homenews/5661621-fa ... rd-nassar/

and MORE:

The Justice Department said the latest records contain “untrue and sensationalist” accusations against Trump from before the 2020 election. "To be clear: the claims are unfounded and false, and if they had a shred of credibility, they certainly would have been weaponized against President Trump already," the department said.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/liv ... p_catchall

Click image to enlarge.

[jusplay4fun]

Good one, Mookie. You posted a picture of Wray, who RESIGNED before Trump took Office in Jan. 2025. Well Done. That gives your entire "thoughtfulness" claim into question, AGAIN. You are not very good at this, are you, Mookie?

Wray announced that he would resign as director in January 2025, coinciding with the conclusion of the Biden administration

I hate to say this, Mookie, but your posts are approaching the low level of the pee rat, and THAT is LOW. You are BETTER than that, so up your game.

[Pack Rat]

Good one, Mookie. You posted a picture of Wray, who RESIGNED before Trump took Office in Jan. 2025. Well Done. That gives your entire "thoughtfulness" claim into question, AGAIN. You are not very good at this, are you, Mookie?

Wray announced that he would resign as director in January 2025, coinciding with the conclusion of the Biden administration

I hate to say this, Mookie, but your posts are approaching the low level of the pee rat, and THAT is LOW. You are BETTER than that, so up your game.

Says the Sunday School Teacher who approves of the cover up of pedophilia and raping of young women. Release the Epstein Files and let's go after the perpetrators of these horrendous crimes.

[Pack Rat]

Is Trump trying to protect the victims or the perpetrators?

[jusplay4fun]

and pack rat fails to acknowledge the LAW requiring protection of the identification of victims of sexual assault. Instead, he wants to instead change the topic and lauch ad hominem attacks against me, with false accusations and more ineffective insults. It is not working pee rat. You continue to FAIL miserably at this attempt for obfuscation; your puny, false, and impotent insults fail, too.

You are not very good at debate or refutation, are you pack rat? (NO SURPRISE here) What a LOSER.

I see your guy Bill Clinton is getting lots of accusation thrown his way. NO Surprise. Same for his key economic advisor Larry Summers:

Larry Summers, long-time stalwart of Democratic Party economics and academic governance, has been disgraced by the release of emails between himself and Jeffrey Epstein — a correspondence that continued long after Epstein’s conviction for sexual offences with children.

The emails are sleazy and cringe-inducing, with Summers seeking Epstein’s advice on the pursuit of women (one of whom was a student). Summers has been expelled from some roles (including membership of the American Economic Association) and has stepped back from others, including his position as economic advisor at the Center for American Progress, a think tank crafting an agenda for what they hope will be the next Democratic presidency. (...)

As Treasury secretary under Bill Clinton, Summers pushed Wall Street deregulation, especially liberalization of trade in derivatives, laying the basis for the crash of 2008. To add injury to injury, as a key economic advisor to Barack Obama, Summers deepened and prolonged the ensuing recession (including a mass foreclosure epidemic) by arguing against the kind of stimulus package that was required, all the while blocking the breakup of the banks responsible for the mess and the holding of their management teams to account.

https://portside.org/2025-12-16/downfal ... ng-overdue

I think this is ONE guy the Dems under Biden tried to PROTECT by not releasing Epstein Files while THEY were in charge.

pack rat has yet to ACKNOWLEDGE ANY of this by his Liberal Democrat Leaders. Well Done, pee rat; continue to protect those who are actually GUILTY of sexual misconduct in this matter, YOUR Liberal Democratic "Heroes," You protect THEM by saying NOTHING negative about any Liberal Democrat in this matter. WHAT A HYPOCRITE AND LOSER pack rat is.

If Trump is Guilty, show me the proof. And don't fall back on the excuse the YOU MAY think the FBI is hiding something. The Dems hid it by NOT releasing any info about any of this under Feeble Old Joe.

Mookie and pack rat (and many other Liberal Democrats) HOPE to embarass Trump on this matter. Both failed miserably here on CC.