Epstein Client List

[Dukasaur]

https://globalnews.ca/news/11586484/at- ... y-epstein/

At least 16 files disappeared from the Justice Department’s public webpage for documents related to Jeffrey Epstein — including a photograph showing President Donald Trump — less than a day after they were posted, with no explanation from the government and no notice to the public.


The missing files, which were available Friday and no longer accessible by Saturday, included images of paintings depicting nude women, and one showing a series of photographs along a credenza and in drawers. In that image, inside a drawer among other photos, was a photograph of Trump, alongside Epstein, Melania Trump and Epstein’s longtime associate Ghislaine Maxwell.

The Justice Department did not say why the files were removed or whether their disappearance was intentional. A spokesperson for the department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

[jusplay4fun]

Here is why, Duk:

The Department of Justice restored online a photo from the Jeffrey Epstein files that contained images showing President Donald Trump after backlash over its removal.

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche earlier said the DOJ removed several Epstein file documents from its website to comply with part of a federal court order aimed at protecting victims.

Blanche denied the removal of a specific photo had anything to do with it showing images of Trump.

The Department of Justice on Sunday restored online a photo from the Jeffrey Epstein files that contained images showing President Donald Trump after backlash over its removal.

The image, which contained two separate photos showing Trump, had been removed by the DOJ from public view after being published on the department’s website on Friday. The image showed an array of items on and in Epstein’s desk or credenza.

One of the photos showed Trump with a group of women, while the other was a well-known image showing him with his wife, Melania, Epstein, and Epstein’s now-convicted accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell.

“The Southern District of New York flagged an image of President Trump for potential further action to protect victims,” the DOJ said in a post on the social media site X.

“Out of an abundance of caution, the Department of Justice temporarily removed the image for further review. After the review, it was determined there is no evidence that any Epstein victims are depicted in the photograph, and it has been reposted without any alteration or redaction.”

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/12/21/epstein ... o-doj.html

and, I said in August 22, 2025 in this same thread, about the LEGAL requirement and need to protect victims:

there is no there there.

I would think that the Grand Jury heard from victims and thus that is what is being protected, the identity and testimony of some who gave testimony under the condition of anonymity. So it is NOT

just an FBI officer's summary of the evidence up to that point.

And Yes, I know that there is LOTS more that the FBI has. I predicted to a few that the Grand Jury testimony would LIKELY NOT be released.

As required by LONG-STANDING Laws and Legal Precedent, we must MUST and DO PROTECT victims of sexual assault and that is why many photos and documents have been redacted (blacked out) in this matter. btw: I am sorry pack rat cannot see prurient photos that he continues to salivate about in his dreams.

Those suffering from TDS keep looking for SOMETHING, some iota, to try to embarass Trump. Remember this when pack rat tries to insult me with his impotent, ridiculous, and inaccurate vituperations. Also remember that pack rat = LOSER

All that Duk and pack rat have are allegations, rumors, and innuendos. There are NO charges, no crimes (by Trump), no proof, and NO one left on base. They refuse to let this issue DIE when there is NO there there.

[Pack Rat]

Cool story bro...

[Pack Rat]

[jusplay4fun]

Cool story bro...

Do you understand Opinion vs. Fact, pack rat? You REALLY are BAD at this, you know.

It's called The LAW, it is NOT a story. So you KNOW:

1. What is the “VAWA Confidentiality Provision”?
The VAWA Confidentiality Provision refers to 34 U.S.C. 12291(b)(2), a provision of the
Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) that requires all grantees and subgrantees
receiving VAWA funding from the Department of Justice, Office on Violence Against
Women, to protect the confidentiality and privacy of persons to whom those grantees
and subgrantees are providing services. The VAWA Confidentiality Provision is
designed to ensure the safety of adult, youth, and child victims of domestic violence,
dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking.

(...)
3. What does it mean to be “covered” by the VAWA Confidentiality Provision?
Grantees and subgrantees “covered” by the VAWA Confidentiality Provision must
adhere to the requirements of that Provision; that is, they may not disclose, reveal, or
release personally identifying information or individual information collected in
connection with services requested, utilized, or denied through grantees’ and subgrantees’
programs, regardless of whether the information has been encoded, encrypted, hashed, or
otherwise protected.
4. What is “personally identifying information”?
“Personally identifying information” means information about an individual that may
directly or indirectly identify that individual. In the case of a victim of domestic violence,
dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking, it also means information that would disclose
the location of that individual.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
on the VAWA Confidentiality Provision
(34 U.S.C. § 12291(b)(2))

https://www.justice.gov/ovw/page/file/1006896/dl

So tell all your liberal friends, especially in Congress, pee pack rat, to learn the BASICS of the Law.

And almost NO ONE watches your silly videos. I think you got ONE response in 6 months on one video, but I ignore most of your posts, so I do not track that sort of thing.