Moderator: Clan Directors





Conchobar wrote:This should be a fun one but don't expect us to be Risk Defenders!





the score 6-2 is correct, maybe you should read on rules first?VioIet wrote:I have to say that I'm not liking how the scoring is being updated here. Gunn, if you are going to give The Pigs credits for wins, before they have actually won the game, then you should do the same for RA.
The actual score right now should read Pigs (4) RA (2).
Where do you get this Pigs (6) RA (2) from? If you're going to factor in 2 games that The Pigs haven't won yet, then you might as well credit RA with the three remaining Pearl Harbor games.
However, I would prefer for you to wait until a game is actually finished, from both sides.

benga wrote:
the score 6-2 is correct, maybe you should read on rules first?




VioIet wrote:RA's Singles Games
Player 1: Trailman- Benelux, flat rate, chained, sunny
Player 2: Scipio79- Europe1914, No spoils, chained, fog
Player 3: doublediamond-Age of Merchants, no spoils, chained, fog
Player 4: Falkomagno- Battle of Iraq, no spoils, chained, fog,
Gunn217 wrote:
Beer Baron - 3 Kingdoms of Korea Esc, Chained, Fog
Conchobar - Steamworks Nuc, Chained, Sunny
Gunn217 - Monsters Esc, Chained, Sunny
Padsta - City Mogul NS, Adj, FogTrench
Well that's interesting because in the two years that RA has been in the ACC cup, I always put the number of wins in the title, as that was much easier for me to calculate. Someone else did the points total or me. It didn't seem to be a big deal of how I did it in the title, because the final score was indeed based on points.Gunn217 wrote:Thanks for seeing it correctly, Benga.
The score in the title is correct, Violet. If I was counting games that weren't yet finished I would would put a little indicator by the game. And why would I care to only count the games that were in our favor? The only score that matters is the final one.
And I don't get where the attitude is coming from. I put in a public post that you guys were stomping us right now despite the close score.
There is no reason to put "points" in the title. The score is the score. All of the ACC games for two years have been scored this way.
That is actually not accurate from my point of view. In my current predictions I have The Pigs winning 11 games and RA winning 8. 14 games are still open and aren't swinging towards any particular side as of yet. And I have never heard anything from either side about how horrible a game has beenalt1978 wrote:ink we've been pretty forthcoming with how horrible some of these early games have been going. Well played set so far RA. Now that we have the count settled, we should be able to get back to business.
Well, the outcome of a war would be a public result in itself. Simply factual. However, I don't believe that RA is winning quite as much as The Pigs may have you believe. It's interesting how we see it so differently. From my point of view, we are struggling in quite a few games, and trying to turn things around.Gunn217 wrote: And I don't know how I can respect someone more than publicly saying that they are kicking our asses.
HE????eggrollonedolla wrote:I would assume his attitude would be coming from feeling disrespected in some way. I think embarrassed is more the case now. Mistakes happen.

i think you are right, a mistake was made, is all.eggrollonedolla wrote:I would assume his attitude would be coming from feeling disrespected in some way. I think embarrassed is more the case now. Mistakes happen.