Elmo. Look out the window. Are you sure about your location?Elmo9199
Posts: 82
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 4:33 pm
Location: Earth
Medals: 1
Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
Elmo. Look out the window. Are you sure about your location?Elmo9199
Posts: 82
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 4:33 pm
Location: Earth
Medals: 1

Sorry this is just funny...Chariot of Fire wrote:Elmo. Look out the window. Are you sure about your location?Elmo9199
Posts: 82
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 4:33 pm
Location: Earth
Medals: 1

this is not lies or twisted comments blitz i wish i had taken a screen shot on the day in ? but let me run you through how jobiwans games were blocked. ON the 31st march you will see this post by myself.Now for the 5 public games you share about eddie, that is also untrue, you do not know any of the facts and all you are saying is fabricated lies and twisting things around that is far from the truth. Those 5 games you may speak of eddie were created in public about 10 to 14 days before the C&A issue existed, when the C&A issue was posted in the forums, those last few public games got filled by the public within 48 hours or so.
that day i was looking at jobiwans games and low and behold someone was creating more quad games and signing him up to them. the only player present was yourself so you can only say you were the only player able to invite himhum is this another twist.
I do believe around late march-early april jobi was automatically kicked out of any public games that were awaiting and random players joined my games unknown to me until they started, and I was thinking how did I get stuck with these partners?
are you on about this game for your info it was a clan training game that one of my clan members contacted me about with a big smile. my chat was not a flame nor a bait also was within the rules.leolou2 wrote:Hey all you boys out there fine if you have a beef with Blitz but stay out of our game chat , this rude and annoying so quit being assholes please. Thank you and enjoy you weekend
your comment in that game seems reasonableeddie2 wrote:are you on about this game for your info it was a clan training game that one of my clan members contacted me about with a big smile. my chat was not a flame nor a bait also was within the rules.leolou2 wrote:Hey all you boys out there fine if you have a beef with Blitz but stay out of our game chat , this rude and annoying so quit being assholes please. Thank you and enjoy you weekend
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=8803365


This is extremely presumptuous considering he was already looked at once. If the ruling is upheld, are you going to feel the same way?Johnny Rockets wrote:
It means nothing now.
You cheated. You lied.
All of your accomplishments have been diminished.
You will no longer be held in a position of trust in any members mind.
You are dirty. Your rank will always have an "*" beside it.
Your point total will furthermore be subject to the inflation of your dishonesty.
Your clan will be cheapened by your presence, it's reputation tarnished by your inclusion.
Quit.
Johnny Rockets
blitz was already found guilty on one part so innocent until found guilty does not count this case was reopened because the punishment did not suit the crime.jackal31 wrote:This is extremely presumptuous considering he was already looked at once. If the ruling is upheld, are you going to feel the same way?Johnny Rockets wrote:
It means nothing now.
You cheated. You lied.
All of your accomplishments have been diminished.
You will no longer be held in a position of trust in any members mind.
You are dirty. Your rank will always have an "*" beside it.
Your point total will furthermore be subject to the inflation of your dishonesty.
Your clan will be cheapened by your presence, it's reputation tarnished by your inclusion.
Quit.
Johnny Rockets
Remember, this being looked at again is getting its justice. Blitz has stated his case, many are "aiding" in the investigation, but nothing has been discussed from the people it matters most. So to say these things only promotes the same idea that you are insisting doesnt exist, and thats smearing a good persons name (at this point).
Doesnt anyone believe in the term innocent until proven guilty anymore? Let the judge decide the case. I understand there is a lot of evidence, but the jury is still out on this one.
This is not true CoF, it was only ONE game, not games plural, one game was made on 3-27-11, that is it. I did not lie, I said NO games were created since the C&A post, which was: by eddie2 on Mon Mar 28, 2011 1:06 pm. I did notice between March 25th thru the 29th, he was missing some turns in his games, I did take some of his turns when I noticed them and then went to work. Remember, his game play as we seen was sporadic, I didn't know that it was at those times, I didn't know he was missing a lot of games, hence I made only ONE game and PM'd him, you on jobi, is all ok, I was waiting for a respone, I got none, when I never heard from him on the 27th and 28th of March, I got worried, because he always responds within 24 hours or less, this is when I made no more games, then went and took his turns on the 28th and 29th, and posted them in game chat, until eddie freaked out, then Leo took them from the 29th, 30, 31st and all thru April. I have not been on his account in over 2 weeks, and the reason I don't remember his password, is because his password is not an easy one to remember. I told king achilles if he wants to me to take some of his turns, I can pm leo and ask him for it and help, I got no response to this. I assume leo has always been taking them and all is ok. So, there was no need to.Chariot of Fire wrote:Blitz,
Well this is probably hardly surprising is it? There is however the small matter of you creating games after you became aware of Jobiwan's incapacity to log into CC. Take Game 8771783 for example. This game was created on the morning of 27th March. We can ascertain this because Game 8771781 happens to be a speed game created that morning. So you made the game, invited the absent Jobiwan, logged into Jobiwan's account and proceeded to join the game. I would contend that this is most certainly an example of 'Hijacking Accounts' and is a serious contravention of CC rules. Just to refresh your memory, this is the text from your own conversation with leolou2 proving the date on which you were aware Jobiwan was missing:Blitzaholic wrote:NO games were created since the C&A post
Blitzaholic wrote:2011-03-25 22:28:16 - leolou2 [team]: Oh where oh where are you at Jobi
2011-03-25 22:29:21 - leolou2 [team]: You should let Blitz have your PW thur a PM
2011-03-26 15:55:29 - Blitzaholic [team]: did jobi miss another turn? geeez
2011-03-26 16:01:36 - Blitzaholic [team]: all on Black Sheep Squadron (landing point) and NO attacks
2011-03-28 10:00:07 - Jobiwan: blitz for jobi
Blitzaholic wrote:Has leo not been taking his turns in late March
Chariot of Fire wrote:Er no, it would appear you have if the above game chat is anything to go by. I'm sure you can start to understand why there are some who doubt the veracity of your words.
Chariot of Fire wrote:It's not that CC can throw a rule at you saying you were obliged to take his turns - it's that you sat back and let it happen. Can't you see how incredibly damning it looks? To have Jobiwan's turns taken in your games and let the others slide is intentional points dumping on the part of the player whose account you control. This is in breach of the Unwritten Rule 'deliberately benefiting from thrown games' and also displays vicarious liability on your part for intentional deadbeating.
CoF this has already been dealt with, this is why I got the warning. I had NO idea he was ever an absentee until Maybe early April, I knew he was gone for a few days prior to that because he never pm'd me back, this is when i got a little worried. I told you and all, I did not realize that was a big NO NO on CC about joining a few games and i owned up to this, I knew it may be frowned upon, but, I did not really think that was a big deal, the evidence of this is what I posted later on and what Kraphtone did to me, he hijacked his clan members passwords and joined 10 of my public games and did this without their permission and I reported it to the multihunters and nothing happened, they let it go. So, how am I suppose to know?Chariot of Fire wrote:Do you not think it prudent to maybe invite someone else as opposed to logging in to an absentee's account and joining games on his behalf? Breach of unwritten rule 'hijacking accounts'.
Blitzaholic wrote:I just pm'd him again to ask if all is ok, I have heard nothing yet. So, what should I do? Reach out to him again? Do I continue to take some of his turns if I can? Do I let him miss his turns? If he is mourning and feels ok some days, does he take them, and if not, he doesn't?, Do I try to ask him if someone else can take his turns? I am trying to do the right thing here, so asking for help on what to do in this situation? What would you do if this was you in matter?
Chariot of Fire wrote:I tell you what I'd do, along with probably 99.9% of all other users on this site. I'd do the right bloody thing from Day 1. Are you really so naive as to not:
- cease entering him in any more of your games
- decline invites to games he cannot play
- drop him from his games waiting
- cover all his active games to the best of your ability
- get help from leolou if he's a co-sitter
- advise all the TOs of Jobiwan's absence and that he'll be unable to join for the time being
- make some public statement to that effect so you yourself are covered
None of these things were done. None whatsoever.
That is just it Chariot of Fire, I always have been positive for cc and strive to be a custodian of all that's fair and good and worth aspiring to. I would never sell anyone down a river, and never for a few measly points as you shared, it makes no sense. It was all just unfortunate couple with unawareness.Chariot of Fire wrote:I've had a few days to mull over what has been said and done and was starting to question whether I had been over-zealous or heavy-handed in my remarks. We have a long playing history of some very memorable (and always challenging) games and, although I've poked fun at your farming antics and boastful posts, I like to believe we held a mutual respect for each other's playing ability. It therefore saddens - and angers more than anything - me when the very player who is atop them all and should be the custodian of all that's fair and good and worth aspiring to turns out to be little more than a talented player who would sell a friend down the river just for a few measly points. That is why I can't forgive and why I don't believe you are worthy of wearing that crown.
This is not TRUE either, I just found 9 or 10 tournmanet games he won between early March thru April 1st. Here are the game numbers below. Note: he won over 700 points in just those tourney games I found, there may be more, not sure how you came up with only 4 dukasuar. So, there was no point dump. if that were true, why go thru all the trouble the trouble to win 10 games for 700 points and lose 50 to 70 for 600 points and roughly break even between March 12 thru April 1st? Again, it make no sense!!!!!! As I looked back, he seemed to be off and on, never an absentee! Now, around March 25th or so I had some concern, then about March 30th to April 1st or 2nd I knew he was not on a couple days, but, I still thought he would come back on CC in a few days after grieving. here are some of the games he won in that timeframe.Dukasaur wrote:I went through Game Finder, selecting only tournament games, going to the last page and working backward to March 08. I stopped at March 08 because most people seem to agree that the abuse didn't start until March 06, and most tournaments allow you 48 hours to join. Therefore, I disregarded quite a few games that were initialized on March 07.
There are 88 Jobiwan tournament games initialized between March 08 and April 01. Of these, he deadbeated 58, was defeated in the ordinary fashion in 24 of them, won 4 of them outright, and amazingly, remains alive in 2 more.
The first of his deadbeat eliminations are as early as March 11th, but games continued to be joined until April 01. That means for THREE WEEKS, his sitter or sitters knew that he was not taking turns, watched his scores plummeting, and yet continued to join more tournament games.
Regardless of whether the rules technically allow a sitter to join tournament games or not, to continue joining them after seeing overwhelming evidence that someone is not going to play and is having his score utterly obliterated has to qualify as some kind of account abuse at the very least.
bruceswar you were found guilty not to long ago and blocked from playing in certain players games for throwing points, so you need not say anything and you were never treated unfairly or went thru any of the abuse I have been taken. And, I never did anything except join some games and I already got punished for it. For the last time, no one knew he was missing that many turns which is a red flag, which also shows I had no clue he was missing that many games, as why would I want to bring any of the attention on myself? Again, makes no sense. and yes, he has been a cook off and on many times throughout his cc career. This is nothing new, you are right about that. If they want to block me form playing with him ever if he ever comes back to CC, fine, I wouldn't like it, but, could understand it.Bruceswar wrote:Sorry this is just funny...Chariot of Fire wrote:Elmo. Look out the window. Are you sure about your location?Elmo9199
Posts: 82
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 4:33 pm
Location: Earth
Medals: 1
Staying on topic from what I can gather is leolou2 started sitting at some point to help out.
P.S. Nobody would have likely noticed any of this had jobiwan not been missing so many turns. That was the first red flag. Aside from that jobiwan is a pretty poor player from what I have seen from him. So being a cook is nothing new to him.
why pretend? he exists, he is real and he was on at times. Kraphtone, you of all people should POST nothing, must I remind you of what you did to me? You purposely hickjacked your clanmates accounts and joined their games and did this without their permission and joined them in 10 of my public games!KraphtOne wrote:Let's pretend jobiwan never existed before the games in question...

Apparently only when one is defending ones selfjackal31 wrote:Doesnt anyone believe in the term innocent until proven guilty anymore? Let the judge decide the case. I understand there is a lot of evidence, but the jury is still out on this one.
eddie2 wrote:let me tell you this case started as a point dump against jobiwan and i contacted a member of the c and a mods (low and behold it now seems this mod was a thota member.) he then responded to me that he was busy so could i make a c and a report. I did not want to do this and was going to leave it in the hands of him.
Even if the ruling is upheld, he was already found guilty and warned. So to answer your question, yes. I've seen JR24 and Blitz put asterisks next to people's names in their threads for much less (including people who had their cases cleared/noted by the mods).jackal31 wrote:This is extremely presumptuous considering he was already looked at once. If the ruling is upheld, are you going to feel the same way?Johnny Rockets wrote:
It means nothing now.
You cheated. You lied.
All of your accomplishments have been diminished.
You will no longer be held in a position of trust in any members mind.
You are dirty. Your rank will always have an "*" beside it.
Your point total will furthermore be subject to the inflation of your dishonesty.
Your clan will be cheapened by your presence, it's reputation tarnished by your inclusion.
Quit.
Johnny Rockets
I think what I am trying to say is, he hasnt been found guilty of all these things he is being accused of. Since he was given a warning for a "minor incident", this is something that doesnt tarnish ones name. So JR making that statement is completely out of line.Bones2484 wrote:Even if the ruling is upheld, he was already found guilty and warned. So to answer your question, yes. I've seen JR24 and Blitz put asterisks next to people's names in his threads for much less (including people who had their cases cleared/noted by the mods).jackal31 wrote:This is extremely presumptuous considering he was already looked at once. If the ruling is upheld, are you going to feel the same way?Johnny Rockets wrote:
It means nothing now.
You cheated. You lied.
All of your accomplishments have been diminished.
You will no longer be held in a position of trust in any members mind.
You are dirty. Your rank will always have an "*" beside it.
Your point total will furthermore be subject to the inflation of your dishonesty.
Your clan will be cheapened by your presence, it's reputation tarnished by your inclusion.
Quit.
Johnny Rockets


Major/Severe Infractions follow a shortened vacation escalation scale of:Funkyterrance wrote:Hmm, if that's the case then I guess I don't understand the point of a warning if you should already know all the rules? The message then would be that it's O.K. to cheat until you get caught... once. You could go a long time cheating before you got caught. Is this the ultimate message? I am not being sarcastic I am sincerely asking the question.
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".